Posts Tagged ‘Center for Innovation in College Media’

Welcome to the latest installment of the College Media Podcast.  The CMP is a collaborative venture between me and Bryan Murley from the Center for Innovation in College Media.

The podcast’s aim: spotlighting big college media news, standout student press work, and an array of helpful and innovative sites, programs, and tech tools.

In our most recent episode, recorded late last week amid news of another big-time college paper’s reinvention, we discuss what actually qualifies as a full-blown digital-first revolution versus just a shift.  Bryan also talks a bit about a possibly helpful site, RebelMouse, which bills itself as nothing less than “your social front page.”

1


Related

State Press at ASU Going Digital-First, Shifting From Daily to Weekly Print Paper

Advantages, Disadvantages to Student Media Digital Experimentation: My Response to Steve Buttry Report

College Media Podcast: Should Student Media Be Cheerleaders for Their School Sports Teams? (Hint: No)

College Media Podcast #5: USA TODAY Redesign & the American University Breastfeeding Controversy

College Media Podcast #4: The Harvard Crimson Quote Review Reversal & More Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #3: RNC, Student Newspaper Presidential Endorsements & Gaming the News

Read Full Post »

There are four main reasons for journalists and journalists-in-training to be active on Twitter, according to noted “tech evangelist and skeptic” Sree Sreenivasan at Columbia University: to connect with an audience in new ways; to bring attention to your work; to enhance your personal and professional brand; and to find new ideas, trends and sources.

Certain sources sporting active feeds on the social media behemoth are especially valuable to journalism students. Here is a starter list of 20 must-follow Twitter feeds– specifically those that will help students learn the craft and keep up with what journalists are debating, enjoying and attempting to understand on a daily basis.

Some feature journalism, media and technology news. Others offer advice and job and internship listings.  And still others are kept by journalists and big thinkers whose new media maxims, mindsets and methods are worth emulating.

The must-follow feeds are listed in alphabetical order.

@10000words: Kept by staff at 10,000 Words, a cutting-edge “multimedia journalism blog– where journalism and technology meet.” More than 27,000 followers.

@brianstelter: Kept by Brian Stelter, a media reporter for The New York Times renowned for his digital journalism prowess. More than 142,000 followers.

@CICM: Kept by journalism educator Bryan Murley on behalf of the Center for Innovation in College Media, a digital think-thank centered on “helping college journalism in the 21st century.”  More than 1,500 followers.

@collegemedia: Kept by me, a complement to this blog. More than 2,200 followers.

@comminternships: Kept by journalism educator Steven Chappell, providing a running list of “internships and jobs of interest to students majoring in communications.” More than 1,700 followers.

@cschweitz: Kept by Callie Schweitzer, the director of marketing and special projects at Vox Media and a leading voice among young journalists and tech-geeks. More than 31,000 followers.

@jayrosen_nyu: Kept by Jay Rosen, an influential press critic, new media scholar and New York University journalism professor. More than 95,000 followers.

@jeffjarvis: Kept by Jeff Jarvis, a big-time author, blogger and journalism professor at the City University of New York’s Graduate School of Journalism. More than 103,000 followers.

@JournalistsLike: Kept by a pair of journalists who collaborate on Stuff Journalists Like, “a satirical blog about journalism and the media.”

@Lavrusik: Kept by Vadim Lavrusik, the journalism program manager at Facebook, regarded as a cutting-edge digital journalist and media futurist. More than 23,000 followers.

@mashable: Kept by Pete Cashmore, the founder and CEO of Mashable, “the largest independent website dedicated to news & resources for the connected generation.”  More than 3 million followers.

@mediagazer: Kept by staff at Mediagazer, accompanying its website which “presents the day’s must-read media news on a single page.”  More than 31,000 followers.

@NiemanLab: Kept by staff at the Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard University, focused on “trying to figure out the future of news.” More than 97,000 followers.

@OHnewsroom: Kept by journalist Kevin Cobb, an accompaniment to his popular website Overheard in the Newsroom, which “delivers the best overheard comments in any newsroom.” More than 64,000 followers.

@PBSMediaShift: Kept by staff at PBS MediaShift, a quintessential “guide to the digital media revolution. Tracking how mobile devices, social media, citizen journalism and new technology are changing the media landscape.” More than 19,000 followers.

@Poynter: Kept by staff at The Poynter Institute for Media Studies, a renowned non-profit “school for journalism & democracy.” More than 63,000 followers.

@profkrg: Kept by journalism educator Kenna Griffin, affiliated with her blog which serves as “a practical resource for student journalists and media advisers with the goal of creating an ongoing conversation among current and future journalists.” More than 4,400 followers.

@romenesko: Kept by Jim Romenesko, a complement to his leading blog featuring “news, commentary and links about journalism and media.” More than 61,000 followers.

@SPLC: Kept by staff at the Student Press Law Center, the country’s leading “advocate for student free press rights.” More than 3,800 followers.

@sree: Kept by Sree Sreenivasan, the chief digital officer at Columbia University and a highly-respected digital journalism guru. More than 37,000 followers.

I’ll post a follow-up must-follow Twitter list for journalism students and student press outlets soon. Which accounts are missing here that should be included in part two?

Related

Top 10 Essential Twitter Tips for Student Journalists

Twitter Interview Requests: Top 10 Rules to Follow

Read Full Post »

In a trend story published in The New York Times last week, freelance reporter Courtney Rubin focused on the changing drinking habits of undergrads in the social media age.

Among Rubin’s findings: Students are determined to get drunk faster, favoring hard liquor and mixed drinks over beer. They increasingly want to be sure a bar is “worth the trip” before heading there, determined in part through friends’ texts and status updates. And they often spend the morning after a night of heavy drinking untagging themselves from embarrassing Facebook photos.

The morning after the piece’s posting though, these apparent trends took a backseat to the factual errors embedded within it. As the high-profile student-run blog IvyGate first revealed, six Cornell University seniors appearing in the feature– the article and an accompanying photo– apparently do not exist.

An editor’s note now implanted beneath the story online notes, “None of the names provided by those students to a reporter and photographer for the Times– Michelle Guida, Vanessa Gilen, Tracy O’Hara, John Montana, David Lieberman, and Ben Johnson– match listings in the Cornell student directory, and the Times has not subsequently been able to contact anyone by those names. The Times should have worked to verify the students’ identities independently before quoting or picturing them for the article.”

Rubin expressed genuine surprise at the mass duping, while confirming she did actually speak to the students.  “I’m honestly shocked by this,” she told The Cornell Daily Sun. “I’m looking at my notebook, going over my notes … It’s all here. I can clearly see where it was in [the bar] where I spoke to them and what they were wearing. Why would I make up names? I don’t make stuff up. Short of asking people for ID, you [assume] that when people give you a name, they represent themselves as who they are or say ‘I don’t want to be quoted.’”

One of the takeaway lessons stemming from the incident, according to Washington Post media blogger Erik Wemple: “Journalists do well to double as paranoiacs. Never trust anyone, no matter how much truth serum they’ve drunk out of an oversize cocktail glass.”

Another lesson: Students do not suffer mistakes, or perceived slights, silently.

The IvyGate fact-check is one example. Another example comes from Cornell veterinary medicine student Nikhita Parandekar. In a Cornell Daily Sun column, she points out that while the piece focuses on undergraduates the main photograph shows graduate students.

Parandekar also takes issue with Rubin’s tone toward student socializing and what she sees as a lack of context in the article for why and how often student drinking occurs.

As she writes in the column, headlined “Last Call for Legitimate Journalism”: “The not-so-subtle jibes at … the pre-gaming/hook-up culture seem to be the author venting frustration more than informing readers about anything at all. … I was disappointed in Rubin’s article because it’s the kind of journalism that gives reporters a bad reputation — unashamed about being biased, half-researched, and unnecessarily antagonistic. This is the first time that I’ve ever thought that the crisis newspapers are facing in terms of readership and accessibility might actually be due in part to the newspapers themselves and not just the electronic world that we live in.”

In the latest episode of our College Media Podcast, the Center for Innovation in College Media’s Bryan Murley and I discuss this journalistic slip, its link to trend stories and parachute reporting, and the increasing fearlessness of student media to challenge what they view as incorrect or illegitimate journalism.


Related

College Media Podcast #6: Student Press Innovation Efforts, Obstacles

College Media Podcast #5: USA TODAY Redesign & the American University Breastfeeding Controversy

College Media Podcast #4: The Harvard Crimson Quote Review Reversal & More Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #3: RNC, Student Newspaper Presidential Endorsements & Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #2: RNC, Princeton Review Rankings, Oklahoma Daily Autopsy Report

College Media Podcast #1: A Red & Black Breakdown

Read Full Post »

Welcome to the sixth episode of the College Media Podcast.  The CMP is a collaborative venture between me and Bryan Murley from the Center for Innovation in College Media.

The podcast’s aim: spotlighting big college media news, standout student press work, and array of helpful and innovative sites, programs, and tech tools.

In our most recent episode, recorded Sunday afternoon, we discussed the recent exchange between digital news guru Steve Buttry and I regarding the advantages and challenges embedded within student press innovation efforts.


Related

Advantages, Disadvantages to Student Media Digital Experimentation: My Response to Steve Buttry Report

College Media Podcast #5: USA TODAY Redesign & the American University Breastfeeding Controversy

College Media Podcast #4: The Harvard Crimson Quote Review Reversal & More Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #3: RNC, Student Newspaper Presidential Endorsements & Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #2: RNC, Princeton Review Rankings, Oklahoma Daily Autopsy Report

College Media Podcast #1: A Red & Black Breakdown

Read Full Post »

Welcome to the fifth episode of the College Media Podcast.  The CMP is a new collaborative venture between me and Bryan Murley from the Center for Innovation in College Media.

The podcast’s aim: spotlighting big college media news, standout student press work, and array of helpful and innovative sites, programs, and tech tools.

In our most recent episode, recorded Friday afternoon, we started with a breakdown of the high-profile USA TODAY redesign (including its new balls) and segued to a discussion about a similarly buzzworthy flap at American University involving classroom breastfeeding and some quality student newspaper reporting.


Related

American University Professor Attacks Student Paper for Asking About Her Mid-Class Breastfeeding

College Media Podcast #4: The Harvard Crimson Quote Review Reversal & More Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #3: RNC, Student Newspaper Presidential Endorsements & Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #2: RNC, Princeton Review Rankings, Oklahoma Daily Autopsy Report

College Media Podcast #1: A Red & Black Breakdown

Read Full Post »

Welcome to the first edition of the College Media Podcast.  The CMP is a new collaborative venture between me and the Center for Innovation in College Media‘s Bryan Murley.

In upcoming episodes, we plan to spotlight big college media news, standout student press work, and array of helpful and innovative sites, programs, and tech tools.

In our premiere podcast, recorded Friday afternoon, we discussed the Red & Black drama at the University of Georgia.  (Click the gray play button at the very bottom next to the volume icon to listen right here on CMM or click on the screenshot to check it out on SoundCloud.)


Related

College Media Podcast – Episode 1

Red & Black Becomes Red & Dead: Student Staff Quits, Protesting Loss of Editorial Control

Open Letter to Red & Black Board of Directors: What the Heck Are You Thinking?!

Read Full Post »

An excellent recent post by CICM intern Lauren Rabaino reveals in pie chart form what those of us following student media’s attempts at Twitter have long known: Is quality tweeting taking place?  Not so much.

Two-thirds of the 50 college media Twitter accounts Rabaino looked at are either solely serving as tiny-url advertisers for stories on the outlets’ sites or saying nothing at all.  The Daily Tar Heel‘s recent tweeterific real-time coverage of a campus bomb scare at UNC is proof that Twitter *can* be harnessed as a news tool at the student level.  Is it happening in any sustained sense as of yet?  I am a follower of most of the accounts cited in the Rabaino breakdown and I can safely say the answer is a resounding no.

—-

Now here in Singapore, Twitter is about as relevant as a winter coat.  The student-age social media elite of S’pore and Southeast Asia instead are (at times quite rabid) aficionados of a competing microblogging service: Plurk, the “social journal for your life.” I recently dove into the Plurk-osphere and want to boldly declare: It is FAR superior to Twitter in a number of ways.

Chief among them: It cuts down on the overwhelming randomness of Twitter-mania, providing a clear-cut timeline to follow and the ability to respond to specific plurks, building a much stronger sense of community.  In this latter respect, student bloggers here use the service to hype their posts and create quite a following, in part because they are able to communicate directly to their friends/fans much more conveniently than via the big T.  Also, an honest confession: I find Plurk simply to be a lot more fun than its chief competwitter.

What do you think- Twitter or Plurk?

Read Full Post »

Last week, I kicked off my list of “25 Random Things About Modern College Media,” putting a professional twist on the Facebook-centric personal list phenomenon that continues to give us insights into parts of people’s lives I had no idea I ever wanted to know about.  My dip into collegemediatopia randomness continues below, with Part 2:

—–

6) College media’s financial future is more sound (or just less bleak?) than their professional counterparts.  As I first wrote back in October (and again in November and again…), the once-indomitable economic spirit of collegemediatopia has cracked as of late under the heavy twin burdens of a crazy-huge recession and a print news meltdown.  But student pubs’ financial states are not being underwritten by the word hopelessness like the professional press (at least in print).  Why?  The $$$ bottom line is uber-low or non-existent at most college media outlets.  Does that ensure student-media-as-we-know-it’s survival long-term?  Absolutely not.  Does that mean they will outlast most professional press?  Absolutely.

—–

7) Stop posing, college yearbooks as we know it are outAs I have previously written, in the age of Facebook and cell phone cameras, traditional yearbooks are like TV antennas and Blockbuster Video: Cute for their quaintness but otherwise entirely outdated. And let’s be honest, they also tend to cost too darn much.

—–

8 ) And so are Fridays.  It’s long been the most hated school day of the week among even the most ambitious collegians, and yet the daily student papers have long churned out all the news considered a Friday fit.  Cue economic collapse.  Now top eds. at a number of papers are rethinking their Friday schemes and leaving their papers in bed.

—–

9) The blogosphere is abuzz with news and views in some way connected to collegemediatopia.  Along with CMM, there is CICM, College Rag, CMA’s “Blog Central“, U.S. News & World Report‘s “Paper Trail,” and the discussion happening over at CoPress, among others.  That’s not even counting the many, many, many individual j-student, j-prof, and j-school blogs.  I think it’s safe to say there has never been so much public talk about college media and the men and women who love them.

—–

10) Along with buzz, there is unparalleled support for student media.  In the states alone, there is the Student Press Law Center, College Media Advisers, Associated Collegiate Press, Intercollegiate Online News Network, UWire, and much, much more.  They are presenting j-students’ work, training them, connecting them with mentors and peers, and fighting for their rights to publish and present stories that occasionally piss off those in power behind the college gates.

——-

Any suggestions for items to add to the list???  Stay tuned for Part 3: The Harsh Truths.

Read Full Post »

Bryan Murley, director of the Center for Innovation in College Media, recently announced an internship opportunity with CICM. Part of the call is below.  Interested students should apply quickly.  The deadline is January 18th!

——-

Internship at CICM

——-

The pitch: How would you like to learn new media skills while having a positive impact on the college media environment? Join us for a semester of new media opportunity as the first intern for the Center for Innovation in College Media for Spring 2009.

——–

What you’ll do: Help maintain the Innovation in College Media weblog by producing relevant content that highlights what college media are doing in a changing media environment. The possibilities for editorial production are limited only by your imagination and energy. Some of the possibilities:

——–

* Podcast interviews with media movers and shakers.
* Reviews of college media online initiatives.
* Maps and databases of college media online sites.
* Live video streams of conferences and/or interviews.
* Round-ups of relevant new media writing.
* And more.

Read Full Post »

A recent New York Times article on how college radio has “maintain[ed] its mojo” in a new media universe makes me mad.  I have no problem with the focus of the piece.  College student radio stations definitely deserve a shout-out.  I just think the NYT piece suffers from numerous cliches of vision and arguments that are badly supported and end up contradicting each other.

————-

First, the cliches.  Here’s the opening scene-setter:

————-

A pizza box and half a dozen laptops lay open in the poster-lined basement lounge of WRPI, the radio station of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y.  As a soda machine hummed, students prepared to record a local metal band and debated whether reggae is fundamentally a 1970s style or “transcends the boundaries of time.”  It was the kind of scene that has played out countless times at campus radio stations. . .

————-

You’re kidding!  A student media area filled with pizza, soda, posters, other clutter, and discussion of off-beat topics?! Maybe I’ve spent too much time in student newsrooms and TV/radio studios in my short time here on Earth, but that description strikes me as more cliche than rain filled with cats and dogs and darkness before the dawn.  Even the start of the nut graph that follows admits it.  Give me something fresh!

————-

The article then goes on to actually call college radio “an anachronism, an analog remnant in a digital world.”  Like, say, newspapers, primetime TV, John McCain, home phones, non-online dating, and non-laser-surgery eyes?  I literally cannot think of a more overused sentiment in recent years to describe the old-new media divide.  Drop the Shakespeare.  We get it.  It’s old-school.

————-

The piece also points out that college radio’s new media transitioning can be seen by the fact that some student DJs are also bloggers . . . MUCH LIKE THE REST OF THE POPULATION.  There is no evidence offered whatsoever that the student radioheads keep blogs because they are involved with college radio.  Instead, it’s probably because they’re young, online a lot, can spell WordPress, and want to write about what interests them.

————-

Next, the counterproductive and scantily-backed-up arguments.  The piece attempts to draw conclusions about a decline in college radio listenership while admitting “[h]ard numbers about ratings for campus radio are scarce.”  Instead, it shows off the only numbers the reporter could find: those touting the downward trend of radio listening overall among the younger generation.  The number is irrelevant.  Just because students are listening to radio in the outside world less does not automatically mean they are listening to college radio less.  As I mentioned in a recent discussion with Center for Innovation in College Media director Bryan Murley, students have said for years that their readership of professional newspapers is down, down, down, but if you asked them most would confirm that they are still picking up their campus newspaper regularly and at times passionately.

————-

You can’t make an A (what students do with outside media) = B (what students do with campus media) argument here, especially without any reliable, relevant stats.  (And let’s be honest, even the most impassioned student DJ won’t try to convince you that college radio has ever boasted a massive audience, regardless of the decade, i.e. you can’t have a dramatic drop in listeners if you don’t have that many to start with.)

————-

Finally, the piece first says that college radio stations “no longer enjoy the influence they had” in promoting and discovering new music, which according to the article apparently reached a peak in the 1980s and 1990s.  But it then mentions that, for two of the hottest new indie acts, “college radio played a far greater role in their good fortune than Web sites” and that “[c]ollege radio is more of a real barometer of what people like and what people are listening to than blogs.”  So which is it, still influential or not so much?

Read Full Post »

Since its launch, the most-viewed posts on this little blog of mine have been those with the words ‘sex’ or ‘Obama’ in the headline.  Am I attempting to exploit the blogosphere’s fascination with the latter here?  Absolutely.  (Happy Thanksgiving!)

 

A brief rundown of college media’s Obama-mania on and around Election Day 2008:

 

 

The post-election front page of The Daily Emerald at the University of Oregon.

The post-election front page of The Daily Emerald at the University of Oregon.

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

In a new MediaShift post, Center for Innovation in College Media Director Bryan Murley writes that student newspaper Web sites have made leaps and bounds from their “little more than shovelware” days that were even as recent as three years ago. 

 

It’s a thoughtful piece, reflecting on the proactive journalistic push and general happenstances that have led new media to be tackled and tamed by many student papers.  In the happenstance category, Murley notes that at times a breaking news event has triggered a reporting plan that has laid the groundwork for continued online success, such as the historic Collegiate Times Web coverage of the 2007 school shootings at Virginia Tech and The Arbiter‘s newmediatastic reporting on Boise State football’s 2006 Fiesta Bowl triumph.

 

A screenshot of today's Collegiate Times at Virginia Tech.
A screenshot of today’s Collegiate Times at Virginia Tech.

 

For me, however, the most attention-grabbing aside of the post was the plight of the others that Bryan mentioned, the college media have-nots, the analogs in a digital world, specifically the more than one-third of U.S. college newspapers still lacking a Web presence (or those whose online identities I’ve found to be nothing more than prehistoric shovelware, with a page of PDF links to archived print issues).

 

Bryan talks in the piece about the cultural and journalistic hurdles that have stood in the way of new media’s seizure of a prominent stake in the student press pantheon and we talked recently about the continued print-online divide.  However, this seems to run deeper.  I mean, my goodness, I’m left with nothing but bolding to express my shock: Thirty-six percent of student newspapers with no Web presence at all.  The heft is not an indictment against the press outlets. It’s a call to arms!

 

What can we do to make that percentage drop faster than the Dow?  I went to a small liberal arts school as an undergrad, one that is still among the have-nots.  I know the challenges- too few staffers doing too much work with no j-curriculum set aside to teach them advanced reporting let alone Web work.  There’s got to be an answer though, a Googlable smoking gun, a way to ensure student news outlets at schools like these don’t fall through the cracks of the Web or the cracks still existing in college media 2.0.

Read Full Post »

I recently gmail-chatted with Bryan Murley, the director of the Center for Innovation in College Media, about the good, bad, and ugly sides of the continued success of the college *print* newspaper specifically.   The discussion came at his request, partially as a follow-up to my recent posts about college print papers’ (at least temporary) invulnerability to the doom-and-gloom scenarios playing out at professional print newspapers.   

 

The beauty of the Internet: I was in an I-cafe in Phuket, Thailand.  Bryan was continuing his new media domination at Eastern Illinois University.

—————

 

ICM Blog

 

ICM Discussion: print and college newspapers

Dan: My basic argument: A print newspaper death watch at the college level is either premature or inaccurate. The financial state of the student newspaper universe is “fundamentally sound,” according to a recent feature in The Chronicle of Higher Education. The papers also remain strong on the content side, producing influential, innovative work that is still being gobbled up in print by campus readers.

 

Is this a knock on new media or online student news outlets? Absolutely not. In many respects, the most creative, significant student journalism is taking place through new media and on the Web. Do I think the new voices are as influential as the old standby, the student newspaper? No, I do not. Do I think that the online versions of student newspapers are as influential as the print versions? No, in most cases, I do not. (Although there are obviously lots and lots of exceptions.)

 

Bryan: I think we basically agree that the print product on the college campus is “fundamentally sound” in terms of readership and advertising – for the time being. I am not quite as certain that the content on the print side is necessarily “innovative.” Influential, yes. The question of the online product is challenging, since so many newspapers are still basically repackaging print stories for online distribution. True innovation in online storytelling is only just developing.

 

In terms of “influence,” the online edition is obviously behind, although it has a greater potential for maximum impact because it can reach a much wider audience. There is a great economic incentive to focus on print to the detriment of online, and that hampers efforts to make the online side more influential on campus…

 

Click here to read the full transcript of our discussion

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,016 other followers

%d bloggers like this: