Posts Tagged ‘Cornell University’

Be productive. Find a point to pointlessness. And fool around a bit.  These are teasers from a few of the tips offered recently by student journalists.

As fall semester and this calendar year came to a close, editors, and columnists at campus newspapers nationwide earnestly reflected on lessons learned, experiences undertaken, and dreams that lay ahead. In some cases, their reflections double as de facto New Year’s resolutions for their student peers to consider.

Below is a sampling of these resolutions, all of them appearing late last semester within student newspaper columns and op-eds.

Be Productive Over Break.  As The Minnesota Daily editorial board at the University of Minnesota advises, “[W]hile break is certainly a good time for well-deserved rest, it’s also important to take advantage of our free time and use it productively. Spending some time looking for scholarships, applying for jobs or internships, polishing résumés, and planning out the rest of the year are important tasks that most of us will eventually have to complete. Therefore, over break, we might as well get them done before homework, exams, and those pestering online quizzes overly burden us.”

1

Enjoy Being Pointless Every Once in A While.  As Duke University junior Lillie Reid argues in The Duke Chronicle, “I’m not saying that having goals and working to attain them is bad. Caring about things and working to do well are possibly the most important attributes of a successful person. The problem arises when we take it too far—when everything has to have a goal-directed point.  When we get so caught up getting what we want that we lose sight of ourselves. . . . Don’t take yourself too seriously. Just because something doesn’t directly contribute to achieving a goal, it doesn’t mean that it’s not worth doing. There is a point to pointlessness.”

2

Brace for Change.  As Christopher Witten writes in The Daily Helmsman about his own experiences at the University of Memphis, “[T]here’s one thing I wish I had known when I was a freshman, or more so just been aware of: everything was going to change– my group of friends, my attitude towards college and even my major (a few times), and most of all the university. The school I feared for so long would become my home. So take it from someone who’s done this a time or two: brace for change.”

3

Cornell University senior Katerina Athanasiou agrees with Witten, noting in The Cornell Daily Sun, “College is a nomadic time. Every six to ten months, we pack up our things to relocate, whether it be from Ithaca to home, or to a new apartment just a few blocks away, or to another hemisphere for a semester. We are in constant motion. We are always moving in to new places and acquiring stuff to make them homes. This might be the ideal time to reconsider what you own and what you actually need.”

Fool Around a Little Bit.  As Florida State University student Samantha Husted tells underclassmen especially in the FSView & Florida Flambeau, “Your sophomore and freshmen years are a time when you’re supposed to fool around a little bit. Go-out-to-that-party-even-though-you-have-a-test-the-next-morning kind of thing. There’s a lot of room for mistakes and it’s the time when you’re allowed to make a few rash decisions. You’re even allotted a few embarrassing moments that you may or may not regret but will most likely turn into a funny story 20 years from now. It’s during this time that you’re supposed to get not all, but a lot of that craziness out of your semester before you have to face your junior and senior year.”

Believe in Yourself.  As University of Arkansas senior Saba Naseem writes in The Arkansas Traveler, “Keep your head up and hold on to your dreams. Giving up is the ultimate failure. You won’t achieve anything that way. I’ve realized that perhaps I won’t achieve my goals the way I planned, but there are other avenues, and perhaps this is an opportunity for me to explore those. There is something out there for everybody. It’s just a matter of determination, of patience and believing in yourself.”

4

Read Full Post »

Officials at SUNY Oswego recently threatened an international journalism student with suspension and campus banishment over emails he sent to hockey coaches while working on a class assignment.

The 30-second gist, according to Gawker and FIRE: Australian native Alex Myers currently studies journalism and works in the Office of Public Affairs at SUNY Oswego.  For a class assignment requiring “a feature on a public figure,” he selected the school’s hockey coach Ed Gosek.  As part of his info gathering legwork, he emailed the hockey coaches at Cornell University, Canisius College, and SUNY Cortland requesting their feedback on Gosek.

The email contained two faux pas– one major and factual and the other more minor and stylistic.  First, Myers identified himself as a SUNY Oswego public affairs staffer, not a student.  Second, he urged the coaches, “Be as forthcoming as you like, what you say about Mr Gosek does not have to be positive.”

The latter statement struck at least the Cornell coach as over the line.  As he wrote Myers, “My interactions with ed gosek have all been off ice as we are div 1.  He is one of the best guys in college hockey.  Your last line of saying your comments don’t need to be positive is offensive.”  Myers quickly apologized, claiming he simply wanted to be clear he was not out to pen a “puff piece.”

As FIRE reported, “The next evening, Myers received a hand-delivered letter from SUNY Oswego President Deborah Stanley, informing him that he was being placed on interim suspension, effective [the next night], and that he would have to vacate his dorm room by that time. The letter also banned him from all campus facilities and informed him that he may be subject to arrest if he came on campus.”

The charges: 1) Dishonesty re: ID’ing himself as a school employee, not a student.  As Gawker confirmed, “No question, he f*cked up there.”  2) Disruptive behavior.  FIRE: “Among the behaviors that merit this charge are ‘harassment,’ ‘intimidation,’ ‘threats,’ ‘conduct which inhibits the peace or safety of members of the college community,’ and ‘retaliation, harassment or coercion.’”

My Take: First charge, check.  Second charge, huh?  Sending an email to some coaches asking for the goods– good and bad– on a peer is harassing, threatening, coercive or inhibiting others’ peace and safety?  As FIRE contends, “Alleging that Myers’ emails could possibly have constituted any of these not only violates the First Amendment, it sends a deeply chilling message to students. How safe can student speech at SUNY Oswego possibly be if any criticisms of faculty, staff, or fellow students find their way to the wrong administrator?”

Fortunately, FIRE intervened, pointing out the egregiousness of the second charge and the overwrought suspension posturing.  The school lessened its final punishment, but is requiring Myers to write a piece “to share with other students in journalism classes . . . what you have learned from your experience.”

The essay I would write, in 25 words: Be honest with all potential sources.  Watch how you word things.  And if school officials ever come after you at least somewhat unfairly, fight back.

Read Full Post »

In a trend story published in The New York Times last week, freelance reporter Courtney Rubin focused on the changing drinking habits of undergrads in the social media age.

Among Rubin’s findings: Students are determined to get drunk faster, favoring hard liquor and mixed drinks over beer. They increasingly want to be sure a bar is “worth the trip” before heading there, determined in part through friends’ texts and status updates. And they often spend the morning after a night of heavy drinking untagging themselves from embarrassing Facebook photos.

The morning after the piece’s posting though, these apparent trends took a backseat to the factual errors embedded within it. As the high-profile student-run blog IvyGate first revealed, six Cornell University seniors appearing in the feature– the article and an accompanying photo– apparently do not exist.

An editor’s note now implanted beneath the story online notes, “None of the names provided by those students to a reporter and photographer for the Times– Michelle Guida, Vanessa Gilen, Tracy O’Hara, John Montana, David Lieberman, and Ben Johnson– match listings in the Cornell student directory, and the Times has not subsequently been able to contact anyone by those names. The Times should have worked to verify the students’ identities independently before quoting or picturing them for the article.”

Rubin expressed genuine surprise at the mass duping, while confirming she did actually speak to the students.  “I’m honestly shocked by this,” she told The Cornell Daily Sun. “I’m looking at my notebook, going over my notes … It’s all here. I can clearly see where it was in [the bar] where I spoke to them and what they were wearing. Why would I make up names? I don’t make stuff up. Short of asking people for ID, you [assume] that when people give you a name, they represent themselves as who they are or say ‘I don’t want to be quoted.’”

One of the takeaway lessons stemming from the incident, according to Washington Post media blogger Erik Wemple: “Journalists do well to double as paranoiacs. Never trust anyone, no matter how much truth serum they’ve drunk out of an oversize cocktail glass.”

Another lesson: Students do not suffer mistakes, or perceived slights, silently.

The IvyGate fact-check is one example. Another example comes from Cornell veterinary medicine student Nikhita Parandekar. In a Cornell Daily Sun column, she points out that while the piece focuses on undergraduates the main photograph shows graduate students.

Parandekar also takes issue with Rubin’s tone toward student socializing and what she sees as a lack of context in the article for why and how often student drinking occurs.

As she writes in the column, headlined “Last Call for Legitimate Journalism”: “The not-so-subtle jibes at … the pre-gaming/hook-up culture seem to be the author venting frustration more than informing readers about anything at all. … I was disappointed in Rubin’s article because it’s the kind of journalism that gives reporters a bad reputation — unashamed about being biased, half-researched, and unnecessarily antagonistic. This is the first time that I’ve ever thought that the crisis newspapers are facing in terms of readership and accessibility might actually be due in part to the newspapers themselves and not just the electronic world that we live in.”

In the latest episode of our College Media Podcast, the Center for Innovation in College Media’s Bryan Murley and I discuss this journalistic slip, its link to trend stories and parachute reporting, and the increasing fearlessness of student media to challenge what they view as incorrect or illegitimate journalism.


Related

College Media Podcast #6: Student Press Innovation Efforts, Obstacles

College Media Podcast #5: USA TODAY Redesign & the American University Breastfeeding Controversy

College Media Podcast #4: The Harvard Crimson Quote Review Reversal & More Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #3: RNC, Student Newspaper Presidential Endorsements & Gaming the News

College Media Podcast #2: RNC, Princeton Review Rankings, Oklahoma Daily Autopsy Report

College Media Podcast #1: A Red & Black Breakdown

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,016 other followers

%d bloggers like this: