Posts Tagged ‘Duke University’

Be productive. Find a point to pointlessness. And fool around a bit.  These are teasers from a few of the tips offered recently by student journalists.

As fall semester and this calendar year came to a close, editors, and columnists at campus newspapers nationwide earnestly reflected on lessons learned, experiences undertaken, and dreams that lay ahead. In some cases, their reflections double as de facto New Year’s resolutions for their student peers to consider.

Below is a sampling of these resolutions, all of them appearing late last semester within student newspaper columns and op-eds.

Be Productive Over Break.  As The Minnesota Daily editorial board at the University of Minnesota advises, “[W]hile break is certainly a good time for well-deserved rest, it’s also important to take advantage of our free time and use it productively. Spending some time looking for scholarships, applying for jobs or internships, polishing résumés, and planning out the rest of the year are important tasks that most of us will eventually have to complete. Therefore, over break, we might as well get them done before homework, exams, and those pestering online quizzes overly burden us.”

1

Enjoy Being Pointless Every Once in A While.  As Duke University junior Lillie Reid argues in The Duke Chronicle, “I’m not saying that having goals and working to attain them is bad. Caring about things and working to do well are possibly the most important attributes of a successful person. The problem arises when we take it too far—when everything has to have a goal-directed point.  When we get so caught up getting what we want that we lose sight of ourselves. . . . Don’t take yourself too seriously. Just because something doesn’t directly contribute to achieving a goal, it doesn’t mean that it’s not worth doing. There is a point to pointlessness.”

2

Brace for Change.  As Christopher Witten writes in The Daily Helmsman about his own experiences at the University of Memphis, “[T]here’s one thing I wish I had known when I was a freshman, or more so just been aware of: everything was going to change– my group of friends, my attitude towards college and even my major (a few times), and most of all the university. The school I feared for so long would become my home. So take it from someone who’s done this a time or two: brace for change.”

3

Cornell University senior Katerina Athanasiou agrees with Witten, noting in The Cornell Daily Sun, “College is a nomadic time. Every six to ten months, we pack up our things to relocate, whether it be from Ithaca to home, or to a new apartment just a few blocks away, or to another hemisphere for a semester. We are in constant motion. We are always moving in to new places and acquiring stuff to make them homes. This might be the ideal time to reconsider what you own and what you actually need.”

Fool Around a Little Bit.  As Florida State University student Samantha Husted tells underclassmen especially in the FSView & Florida Flambeau, “Your sophomore and freshmen years are a time when you’re supposed to fool around a little bit. Go-out-to-that-party-even-though-you-have-a-test-the-next-morning kind of thing. There’s a lot of room for mistakes and it’s the time when you’re allowed to make a few rash decisions. You’re even allotted a few embarrassing moments that you may or may not regret but will most likely turn into a funny story 20 years from now. It’s during this time that you’re supposed to get not all, but a lot of that craziness out of your semester before you have to face your junior and senior year.”

Believe in Yourself.  As University of Arkansas senior Saba Naseem writes in The Arkansas Traveler, “Keep your head up and hold on to your dreams. Giving up is the ultimate failure. You won’t achieve anything that way. I’ve realized that perhaps I won’t achieve my goals the way I planned, but there are other avenues, and perhaps this is an opportunity for me to explore those. There is something out there for everybody. It’s just a matter of determination, of patience and believing in yourself.”

4

Read Full Post »

One of the most prolific writers featured on the website of The Chronicle, Duke University’s student newspaper, is a gray-haired alum from the 1960s.  Ed Rickards, a former journalist, is currently a full-time “Duke Checker.”

Under that pseudonym (very recently switched from “Fact Checker”), Rickards, 69, runs “an increasingly popular blog that focuses on the governance of Duke and the scandals that occur on the university’s campus.”

He frequently contacts Chronicle staffers by email about their stories.  And he comments, a ton, on Chronicle articles online– often pointing out additional information that does not frame Duke administrators in the most flattering light.  His words and pseudonym appear in the comments section of almost every major Chronicle news and opinion article.

Even within a digital sphere that is anything-goes, Rickards stands out for the stunning amount of comments, email messages, and blog posts he composes daily and the hyper-intense focus on his alma mater that has seemingly become his later life’s mission.

Is Rickards a valuable voice complementing the student newspaper’s efforts at holding powerful Blue Devils in check?  Is he poison-pill-spouting, as one Chronicle staffer admits, as many conspiracy theories as valid points?  And what motivates someone to spend his sunset years chasing leads and calling BS about a school from which he has long since graduated?

Recently, Chronicle special projects editor Taylor Doherty set out to answer those questions.  In a late October Chronicle feature on Rickards, he provided a face and a backstory to a man described in the headline as “the university’s unorthodox critic.”  Rickards commented three times on the piece.

In the Q&A below, Doherty briefly explains what drew him to profile a man who had emailed him more than 100 times about Chronicle content the year before.  He also outlines what he considers the strengths and weaknesses of Rickards’ work.

Taylor Doherty, special projects editor, The Chronicle, Duke University

OK, so this random guy sends you a slew of messages when you’re news editor [Doherty's previous position at the Chronicle].  What led you to eventually look at him as newsworthy versus simply just being a crank?

As I learned more about him, I just found him really interesting.  Here was a Duke graduate from the 1960′s who– from Manhattan– was writing thousands and thousands of words about the darker sides of Duke.  I definitely wasn’t the only one who wondered why he was running this blog and why he cared so much years after leaving Duke.

My other motivation was that he was growing a following on campus.  Duke is planning to open a campus in China in 2013, and some faculty have opposed the plans pretty vocally.  Fact Checker would post confidential documents online that faculty would anonymously pass on to him, and it drove some people at Duke absolutely crazy that the information was being leaked.  I got the sense that his criticism of the China plans was influencing the way that a number of people at Duke were thinking about the campus, and so I thought a story about where he was coming from was important.

Rickards has obviously rubbed some Duke administrators the wrong way and I’m guessing came across as cantankerous to you at first.  What are your impressions of him now that you’ve interviewed him?

He was just as entertaining and quirky as I had hoped when I started reporting.  That made the story easy to tell, because he told me so many anecdotes that really gave what I thought was a good sense of his personality, character, and life philosophy.  We also finished the profile on good terms, which was interesting because I do disagree with some of his work.  I think he can present situations in ways that are misleading and biased, and I told him that when we met.  But he was respectful as a source and always willing to talk.  He seemed to enjoy the process.  A few days after the story came out, he sent me an email and said he enjoyed reading the profile and asked me to send him a print copy.

How does the Chronicle view Rickards’ blog– is it competition, a source for ideas, a National Enquirer-type outlet to read for a laugh?

This is tough to answer.  I should probably start by saying that I’m speaking from my perspective, because you might get different answers from other members of the staff.  I definitely did not see Fact Checker as competition for the paper, but I also didn’t see the blog as an entirely useless source of information.  The Fact Checker blog has different methods than the Chronicle.  First, he grants anyone who asks for it anonymity, which might make the reader wonder about what the motivations of some of his sources are.  There’s one person, for example, who he calls The Allen Building Mole, which is a reference to Duke’s administrative building.  Rickards knows absolutely nothing about this person, but he says he generally provides accurate information.  Who knows why this source decides to write in to Fact Checker.

Second, the Chronicle has a different standard of verification before publishing.  Rickards seems willing to post whatever information he has on a topic even if the story might be incomplete or, in some instances, incorrect.  Maybe that means he’s trying to spark a conversation more than be a source for verified facts.  The Chronicle takes more time to verify information before publishing it, a more traditional approach to journalism.  Then again, Rickards recognizes this difference in approaches and said he doesn’t want to be held to the same standards as the Chronicle or other newspapers.

The big question: What did the comments on your piece about Rickards focus on?

The comments on Chronicle stories can be pretty entertaining, including when Fact Checker posts.  In addition to Fact Checker– who is now starting to go by the name Duke Checker– two of the commenters on my story were DukePieMafia (who periodically writes about throwing pies in the faces of people he doesn’t approve of) and Duke.Swamp.Gator (whose gimmick is to throw a “CHOMP” or two into his comments).

A few people thanked Rickards for his work on the blog, but not all the commenters get along.  Fact Checker faces a fair bit of backlash when he posts on the Chronicle‘s website, and this story was no exception to the rule.  Parts of that conversation seemed productive, but in other comments it’s just the same lingering arguments between people that don’t like each other.  Rickards didn’t seem to mind all that much.  As he wrote at point, “You are just seething today, PieMafia, that the Chronicle profiled me.  And not you.”

Read Full Post »

Built atop the power of Tumblr, PhotoShelter, and more than 40 student photographers, The Duke Chronicle‘s photo blog Shutter is a must-see snapshot smorgasbord.

At this moment, on the homepage alone, 10 separate slideshows are actively scrolling through themselves– displaying Duke students (mostly student-athletes) dunking, tackling, kicking, dribbling, speaking, and doing whatever is taking place in the image below.

Kudos especially for the huge size of the featured images, the timeliness of the uploads, and the self-scrolling function that gives the blog a funky liveliness (almost as if the slideshows are competing against each other for your attention) and enables you to see Lebron James, Coach K, and local hip-hop and jazz band The Beast within seconds of each other with barely a touch of the mouse.

Read Full Post »

The Princeton Review has released its annual listing of the biggest and best at colleges and unis nationwide.  Along with rundowns of the top party schools, school athletic facilities, and student radio stations, the Review has named the best U.S. college newspapers.

The top 20 sways heavily toward indie pubs at large state schools that publish just about daily and still enjoy large print circs.  One heartening name to see on the list: The Hilltop at Howard University, which went through a rough financial patch back in 2008.

The full list is below.  By the way, the Review only names the schools on its site (free registration required to access it), not the student papers affiliated with them.  So before scrolling down this post, a fun game for the j-geeks out there: the student newspaper knowledge test. How many student papers can you name from the Review’s list of schools, without Googling?  (I nabbed 19 out of 20.  Sorry Battalion!  Brief mental block. Oh, and WVU, yes, I needed a spell check on Athenaeum.) :)

1. The Yale Daily News, Yale University

2. The Daily Tar Heel, University of North Carolina

3. The Diamondback, University of Maryland

4. The Hilltop, Howard University

5. The Battalion, Texas A&M University

6. The Daily Collegian, Penn State University

7. The Harvard Crimson, Harvard University

8. The State News, Michigan State University

9. The Chronicle, Duke University

10. The Daily Reveille, Louisiana State University

11. The Daily Athenaeum, West Virginia University

12. The Daily Texan, University of Texas at Austin

13. The Daily Bruin, UCLA

14. The Independent Florida Alligator, University of Florida

15. The Indiana Daily Student, Indiana University

16. The Badger Herald, University of Wisconsin-Madison

17. The Daily Northwestern, Northwestern University

18. The Daily Mississippian, University of Mississippi

19. The Cornell Daily Sun, Cornell University

20. The Pipe Dream, State University of New York at Binghamton

Read Full Post »

Running a student newspaper, big or small, daily or weekly, is a full-time job.  It is a practical, hands-on educational experience that teaches a student just as much as (and usually more than) even the best of classes.  In an editorial published today, top editors at The Chronicle, the student daily at Duke University, are pushing for more recognition of their hard work and the educational benefits accrued from it.

——-

Through an interesting “underloading” policy, certain leaders of campus organizations at Duke are being allowed to lessen their coursework demands by having their leadership positions count for one-credit each over two semesters.  The goal is to give these students a bit more time to pursue their work, learn from doing, and in turn hopefully improve the university with their achievements.

——-

The top editor at The Chronicle is included among the student leaders who are eligible for what is basically a course reduction.  The newspaper’s leadership though wants more than two semesters of reduction.  The arguments: The top editor normally serves a year first as a higher-up of a specific department within the paper, a full-time job itself; current top editors are already “unofficially” reducing their coursework through easy electives such as phys. ed.; the university lacks a “true journalism program,” making the newspaper an incredibly important learning vehicle on par with coursework; and a university the size and caliber of Duke deserves a daily paper and in turn a staff with a bit more time to put it together.

——-

This dilemma is in the end unsolvable.  Why?  Because it represents the fascinating engima that is the college newspaper.  It is both the heartbeat of most elite campuses while at the same time technically relegated to a mere student activity or an independent side pursuit.  It is of course officially an outside endeavor, done in free time by students who are at university for another main reason (classes/graduating), yet often represents the very core of j-students’ passions and reasons for being.  The time and effort it takes to produce would stun almost anyone curious or courageous enough to spend even a week in a typical student newsroom.

——–

Does this time commitment, the quality of content, and the necessity of its existence on university campuses deserve greater recognition and respect from the hand that feeds it (with information) and that it at times bites?

Read Full Post »

A short article run in The Chronicle at Duke University earlier this month about a student’s attempted suicide has spurred vicious criticism on campus and even a poster campaign calling for the editor in chief’s resignation.

 

Via College Rag, critics’ two main points of contention: The article effectively identifies the student involved (by naming his dorm and gender, leaving an easy-to-follow gossip trail); and the incident is only slightly newsworthy at best (since it concerns a private citizen carrying out an essentially private act).

 

A letter to the editor from a former Chronicle editor asked: 

 

What, exactly, was the point of running that story? The student was apparently not charged with a crime, nor does the attempt appear to have had newsworthy ripple effects beyond the predictable gossiping about it. Lest you think that suicide attempts are inherently newsworthy, please ask yourself when you last saw a major newspaper run an article about the suicide attempt of a non-public figure.

 

Last week, angry students peppered Duke’s campus with posters adorned with similar complaints and unflattering photos or faux-photos (it’s not clear which) of the newspaper’s editor in chief. 

 

The story and reader reaction highlight the journalistic difficulty of dealing with suicide and attempted suicide.  Do I think an incident that brings police and EMS to a campus dorm late at night deserves coverage?  Yes, I do.  If I was a student living in the dorm, I would be interested to know why sirens were blaring outside my window and I think it is important to hear from authorities instead of just hall gossips.  Should the story’s reporting have been more general, avoiding references to the student’s gender and the specific nature of the incident (including labeling it an attempted suicide, a term whose connotation runs far deeper than its literal law enforcement meaning)?  In my opinion, again, yes.

 

What do you think?

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,033 other followers

%d bloggers like this: